Make It Happening – closing plenary

The final session followed a packed day of discussion with 57 speakers  addressing five themes: public engagement, health equity, London and elsewhere, building and neighbourhood design and making it happen.

Our expert panel reflected on what they’ve heard and seek to draw conclusions about what comes next. Speakers will address making change happen from the national, city, borough and masterplan scales.

Lisa Taylor urged speakers to explore how thinking about equity pushes the built environment sector to engage with climate resilience. From their areas of expertise, what are the key priorities that we should tackle collectively? Read on to find out what they said.

Speakers

  • Lisa Taylor Executive Director, Future of London (Chair)
  • Marcus Bate Partnerships and Communities Director, Mount Anvil
  • Rob Bristow Director – Climate Change, Planning and Transport, Lambeth Council
  • Rachel Toresen-Owuor Senior Director, Local Partnerships
  • Rhianna Wilsher Partner, Trowers & Hamlins

Rhianna Wilsher, Trowers & Hamlins

Rhianna is a Partner and clean energy lawyer in Trowers & Hamlins’ Energy and Sustainability team. She specialises in retrofit, sustainable development, district heating schemes and energy purchasing.

High-level policy must drive climate resilience at a local level, Rhianna said. She shared where we are now and what innovation could look like.

  • Policy drivers are important for climate resilience, because there will always be competing demands for funding, but particularly at the moment. We need policy to direct money where its needed, provide incentives and mandate change. Sometimes ‘regulating to deregulate’ by removing traditional funding hurdles is important in order to create space for innovation.
  • Moving forward, retrofitting our ageing housing stock is a key challenge. There are existing mechanisms for dealing with energy efficiency and net zero in new build homes, the scope of which could be easily adapted to include climate resilience and put a focus on retrofit.
  • The public sector must be consistent in its messaging about what’s expected from people: this will create certainty that’s needed to drive demand and green financing.

“Everyone knows there’s no one size fits all when it comes to limiting solar gains. The key thing is that we take the conversation from new build to retrofit: building regulations need to make sure that people look at heat resilience whenever they make a change to their building.” – Rhianna Wilsher

Rachel Toresen-Owuor, Local Partnerships

Rachel is a senior director at Local Partnerships, an in-house public sector consultancy owned by Local Government Association, the Treasury and the Welsh Government.

“It’s horrifically unfair how climate change is affecting vulnerable people much more than anyone else”, Rachael said. Public Health Wales has shown that vulnerable people face a triple threat from climate change, COVID and Brexit. For many, climate changes worsens existing pressures they are facing, such as the cost of living, access to services, and being cut off from communities they rely on.

Climate resilience must happen now and not “after we’ve done net zero in 2030”.

  • There’s an urgent need for more finance for climate risk and resilience – not just mitigation.
  • The services local authorities deliver build resilience in communities. The public sector needs to examine what service delivery will look like in 5-, 10- and 25-years’ time and how it can be directed to vulnerable people. This means gathering data, mapping vulnerability and communicating what public services will look like in a changed climate.
  • Consistency in our approach is essential for scaling delivery. It’s true that hazards are experienced in different ways – but consistency is still needed to set roles, responsibility and accountability. Regionals and central governments should be drivers of this.

“Local authorities are not going to be the risk owner for everything. They’re not the accountable body for every adaptive measure – but they are the convenor for those organisations. They need to have oversight, because they will be the first port of call for communities in crisis.” – Rachel Toresen-Owuor

Rob Bristow, Lambeth Council

Rob is director for climate change, planning and transport at Lambeth Council. Climate change is a political and corporate priority for Lambeth, he said.

As a council we are clear that the impact of climate change is greatest on residents who are vulnerable due to housing conditions, health, age and other factors.

The borough is vulnerable to climate change where there are dense buildings and vulnerabilities within communities, Rob said. Some parts of the borough are vulnerable to flooding and urban heat island effects.

Rob analysed the levers of change that sit at a borough level.

  • Local authorities often have the data they need on heat inequality – the challenge is analysing it. Lambeth Council have been working with Impact on Urban Health to map heat vulnerability and target interventions.
  • London Councils and the Greater London Authority will release a study on the cost of climate inaction on the local level – watch this space.
  • Lambeth Council are building partnerships for climate action, bringing together health authorities, education institutions, private sector organisations and a citizen’s assembly. Its climate action plan draws on these partnerships.

“How can we be more effective in making the case for investment in climate adaptation? We’ve got to speak to a local level. If we don’t make investments now, we’re going to have to find more money down the road. It’s a false economy not to.” – Rob Bristow

Marcus Bate, Mount Anvil

Marcus is director for partnerships, communities and sustainability. He works for Mount Anvil, a property developer that focuses on redevelopment of housing estates in central London that are no longer fit for purpose.

Marcus named finance and changing mindsets as key ways to shift the dial on climate resilience.

  • The availability and affordability of green finance mechanisms doesn’t match what is needed, Marcus said. This is a fundamental barrier; financial incentives are needed to scale initiatives.
  • Calculations of value still don’t factor in the cost of inaction. To make smart decisions and deliver on resilience, the built environment sector must look at value risks and well as value-add.
  • We need a mindset shift, and we need to frame resilience in terms of equity, Marcus urged. How do we make people – like himself – on the boards of joint ventures and large masterplan schemes feel that they are less rule-bound, and licensed to prioritise care, dignity and what they feel is truly equitable?

“I don’t think partnerships for climate resilience have been delivered very well. Three challenges where the sector can improve are around mindset, availability of finance and community involvement.” – Marcus Bate

Future of London’s takeaways

Our plenary speakers explored the mechanics of change through a variety of scales: national, city, borough and site. Yet they consistently looked to national government for direction. There’s a need for policy to enforce and support resilience initiatives. And enabling clarity and consistency where possible will encourage climate finance to grow.

Finance for climate resilience remains miniscule. This is due to a shortcoming in our methods for measuring value, which don’t yet prize stability or factor in risk. In other words, we’re using old tools for a new world.

Speakers identified cross-sector partnerships as essential for delivering resilience with agility. There’s a need to coordinate data, responsibility, risk and funding across various sector players. Local authorities will be the first port of call for citizens at risk. How do we ensure that they are set up to match demand?

Thank you to our conference sponsors

Arup | Countryside Partnerships | Mount Anvil | Local Partnerships

Impact on Urban Health | Pollard Thomas Edwards | Potter Raper | Trowers & Hamlins